6 Church Street, Gardiner, Maine 04345 Pat Hart, Chairperson
Dorothy Morang, Recording Secretary
 CITY OF GARDINER PLANNING BOARD
Gardiner Planning Board November 9, 2005
City of Gardiner, Maine Regular Meeting 6:00 PM
ROLL CALL
Present: Pat Hart Deborah Willis Pamela Mitchel
Edward Lawrence James Montell
Absent: Bob Moody, Alternate
Also Present: Antje Kablitz, Planner, Staff to Planning Board
Anne Davis, Interim Planning/Development Director
Dorothy Morang, Planning Board Recording Secretary
Kane Coffin Bryan Carlson Joseph Donahue
Jason Gall Elliot Thayer Carla Noyes
1.) Chair Pat Hart called the meeting to order at 6:04 PM.
2.) Roll call taken.
3.) Deborah Willis made a motion to approve the minutes with 2 changes as noted – the word note was misspelled twice on page 3 and Ms. Gleason had lived in her current residence for a number of years, not 6 . Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 4 in favor. 0 opposed. 1 abstained (Jim Montell was not at meeting) Motion passed.
Chair Hart went over the schedule for the evening.
NEW BUSINESS
4.) Public Hearing – Site Plan Approval
Matthew and Carla Noyes, Applicants are seeking Site Plan Approval for a Change of Use to operate an In-home Business and create an in-law apartment. The property, located at 32 Danforth Street, is within the High Density Residential Zoning District, City Tax Map 31, Lot 146
Carla Noyes introduced herself and gave an overview of her plans. She has had 3 dwelling units in her home. She also had a Minor Home Occupation, a catering business. She has expanded the business into more than 1 room, so she needs to come to the Planning Board for Site Plan Approval. She has no additional employees, deliveries or outside vents.
The Board members reviewed the Application for completeness. The following items were identified as needing to be submitted:
Section 5 H.
4. h – a copy of the deed;
5. b. – put distances of all property lines on the map;
5. g. – put locations and dimensions of existing driveways, streets, parking and loading; and
waivers for 5. c, d, e, f, h, i, j. l, m & r.
Pam Mitchel made a motion that the Application is complete with the addition of the following items: that we have a copy of the deed, that the property lines be sketched onto the drawing, that the Applicant requests waivers for Section 5. H. 5. c, d, e, f, h, I, j, l, m & r and that the Applicant add the dimensions of the driveway to the drawing.
6:30 PM meeting opened for Public Hearing.
Joe Donahue, an abutter spoke on this Application. He indicated that he has lived in the neighborhood for about 20 years and it has been very residential. He is not concerned about the Noyes, but is concerned about change or expansion of the business that might change the character of the neighborhood. He asked whether the business applies to the current occupants or does not pass on to future occupants and whether the Planning Board would have to look at it if any changes were made. Joe also was concerned about setting precedent so others can take advantage in the future. Pat Hart indicated that the Planning Board issues the approval but does not enforce it. The Code Enforcement Office monitors it and if there were any changes, it would have to come back through the Planning Board. Pat said that the Planning Board appreciates input from the neighbors and they try to consider each application separately and not set precedent. There are conflicts within the Land Use Ordinance
and the City is trying to address them through the Ordinance Review Committee.
Carla Noyes said she is using one of the units for the catering business – the kitchen, one room for storage in which she has a desk with a lap top. She doesn’t have people in and she has no filing cabinet. Board members discussed this issue and decided that this did not constitute an office in terms of a business office.
6:41: Close meeting for Public comment.
Pat Hart asked Dorothy if there had been any correspondence or comments relative to this Application. Dorothy said only from Mr. Donahue who had come in to view the Application.
Antje Kablitz, Planner, indicated that the Applicant is down sizing to a 2-unit and cannot use this unit for a residence unless she comes back to the Planning Board to return it to a multi-unit.
Planning Board members reviewed the Applicant’s response to each of the Performance Standards in Section 3 of the Land Use Ordinance and voted on them individually.
A. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard A does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
B. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard A does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
C. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard C does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
D. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard D does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
E. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard E does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
F. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard F does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
G. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard G does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
H. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard H does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
I. Performance Standard I. 2.
a. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard I. 2. a. has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
b. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard I. 2. b. has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
c. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard I. 2. c. has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
d. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard I. 2. d. has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
e. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard I. 2. e. has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
f. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard I. 2. f. has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
g. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard I. 2. g. has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
h. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard I. 2. h. has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
i. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard I. 2. i. has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
j. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard I. 2. j. has been met with the condition that there is no parking by staff on the premises. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
k. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard I. 2. k. has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
l. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard I. 2. l. does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
J. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard J does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
K. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard K does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
L. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard L does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
M. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard M does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
N. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard N does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
O. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard O does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion. Motion and second was withdrawn.
Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard O has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
P. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard P does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
Q. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard Q does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
R. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard R does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
S. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard S has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
T. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard T does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
U. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard U does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
V. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard V does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
W. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard W does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
X. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard X has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
Y. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard Y has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
Z. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard Z does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
The Applicant discussed whether to continue as a 3-unit or change to a 2-unit. She decided to go forward as a 2-unit with a Home Occupation.
AA. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard AA has been met with the condition that the lot dimensions be added to the drawing and there is no parking in the front of the building. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
BB. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard BB does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
CC. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard CC does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
Planning Board members reviewed the Applicant’s response to each of the Site Plan Review Criteria in Section 5 of the Land Use Ordinance and voted on them individually.
1. a. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 1. a. as written by the Applicant. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
1. b. Skip for now.
2. Skip for now.
3. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 3 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
4. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 4 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
5. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 5 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
6. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 6 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
7. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 7 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
8. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 8 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
9. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 9 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
10. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 10 as written with the condition that the Applicant provides a letter from the Gardiner Water District indicating adequate water supply for the business and the 2-family dwelling. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
11. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 11 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
12. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 12 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
13. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 13 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
14. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 14 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
15. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 15 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
16. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 16 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
17. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 17 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
18. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 18 as written with the condition that the Applicant provides a copy of the State Catering License. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
19. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 19 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
20. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 20 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
21. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 21 as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
2. Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 2 as written with the condition that any use other than catering as the Home Occupation shall require Planning Board approval. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
1.b Pam Mitchel made a motion that we accept Review Criteria 1.b as written. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
Pam Mitchel made a motion that we approve this Application with the conditions that the Applicant provide us with a copy of the deed; a sketch property lines on the map and give us dimensions of the property on the map; make a note on the map that the facility will not be used as an office; add the dimensions of the driveway to the map; that the Applicant will provide us with the 10 waivers previously mentioned; a letter from Gardiner Water District attesting to the sufficiency of the water supply; a copy of the State Catering License; a copy of the City Vitular’s License; that there will be no parking out front or by staff in the back; and with the note that any use other than catering shall require Planning Board approval. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
Pat Hart mentioned that she had received notice on behalf of the Planning Board that the Town of Pittston, as required as an abutting town, has developed their Comprehensive Plan.
7:45 PM Break
7:52 PM Meeting Resumed
5.) Public Hearing – Final Subdivision Approval
Carlos Gonzalez, Brian Carlson, & Michael Guidici are seeking Final Approval of a 13-lot subdivision named Pahrk Place, changed to Carlson Heights. The property, located at 324 Marston Road, is within the Rural (R) Zoning District, City Tax Map 17, Lot 16.
Pat Hart asked if any Board member had any thing to disclose relative to this Application. Deborah Willis indicated that she lives on the Capen Road, which intersects with the Marston Road. Pat Hart disclosed that she is a friend of an abutter of the proposed subdivision, Patsy Gleason, but it would not be an issue for her.
They went over the list of items that were to be provided and determined that they were all here.
8:00 PM meeting opened for public comment.
Brian Carlson said he was for it.
Pat Hart asked Dorothy if there had been any correspondence or comments concerning this proposal. Dorothy said no.
8:01 PM public hearing closed.
Kane Coffin, Agent for the Applicant, indicated that the Subdivision had been renamed at the request of the Fire Chief to Carlson Heights. The road will be Carlson Lane. He also explained that they have given Patsy Gleason an easement to help with her driveway issue.
Antje Kablitz indicated that in talking with Bill Najpauer from Kennebec Valley Council of Governments (KVCOG), the driveway would be a civil matter and a safety issue and they should stop Patsy from using the driveway as is. Ed Lawrence said it does meet the City’s Ordinance. Kane Coffin agreed.
The Board members reviewed the Applicant’s response to each of the General Standards in Section 8 K of the Land Use Ordinance and voted on each of them individually.
1. Skip for now.
2. Pam Mitchel made a motion that General Standard 2 has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
3. Pam Mitchel made a motion that General Standard 3 has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
4. Pam Mitchel made a motion that General Standard 4 has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
5. Pam Mitchel made a motion that General Standard 5 has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
6. Pam Mitchel made a motion that General Standard 6 has been met with the granting of the waiver of the requirement of granite monuments. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
7. Pam Mitchel made a motion that General Standard 7 has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
8. Pam Mitchel made a motion that General Standard 8 has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
9. Pam Mitchel made a motion that General Standard 9 has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
10. Pam Mitchel made a motion that General Standard 10 has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
11. Pam Mitchel made a motion that General Standard 11 has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
12. Pam Mitchel made a motion that General Standard 12 has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
13. Pam Mitchel made a motion that General Standard 13 has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
14. Pam Mitchel made a motion that General Standard 14 has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
1. Pam Mitchel made a motion that General Standard 1 has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
Antje brought up Section 8 A. 14 and thought it may apply to this Application, but she had not noticed it before and since it was not in an obvious place in the Ordinance and had not been addressed thus far, we should not get into it now. Board members agreed.
Pam Mitchel made a motion that we approve this subdivision. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
Pat Hart asked the Board members to sign the Mylar copy.
8:26 PM Break
8:34 PM Meeting resumed.
6.) Public Hearing – Site Plan Approval
J & R Associates, Jason Gall, Applicant is seeking Site Plan Approval for a Change of Use for a portion of an existing warehouse to Manufacturing, Packaging Goods and Distribution. The property located at 1 Commonwealth Avenue, is within the Planned Development (PD) Zoning District, City Tax Map 28, Lot 68
Elliott Thayer introduced himself and said that he was the Agent for Jason Gall, the Applicant. Elliott indicated that the building is currently a warehouse and distribution center. They are proposing to use about 10% of the total square feet as a bakery. Isamax Bakery would like to put their bakery in it.
Pat Hart asked if any member thought that they could not be impartial to this proposal. They all felt they could be impartial.
The Board members reviewed the Application for completeness. The following items were requested as required in Section 5 H:
Pat Hart wanted it noted that within the list of abutting property owners required in Section 5 H. 4. d., Map 28, Lot 48 is 134 High Holborn Street, not 34 High Holborn Street as listed.
5. o. – need existing exterior lighting information on the map;
5. c, e (ground floor elevation), f, i, l, and r – request waivers;
6. b. – need a description of the ground floor elevation of the freezer to be built;
6. i. – need a letter from Gardiner Water District indicating sufficient water supply;
6. o. – need the start & completion dates
6. p. – written information on traffic generated, specifically truck traffic; and
6. g. - need to request a waiver.
Pam Mitchel made a motion that the Application is complete with the addition of waiver requests for Section 5, H. 5. c, e (ground floor elevation), f, i, l, r & Section 5, H. 6. g; the addition of existing exterior lighting information on the map; a description of the ground floor elevation of the freezer to be built; a letter from Gardiner Water District attesting to the sufficiency of the water supply; the start and complete date and information about the traffic generated with specific mention of truck traffic. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
Antje asked about the freezer, whether it is an accessory unit or part of the building. They discussed it and determined that because you can’t access it except through the building, it was a part of the building.
The Board members reviewed the Applicant’s response to Section 3, Performance Standards and voted on each of them individually.
A. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard A. has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
B. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard B does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
C. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard C has been met with the condition that there is no use of the driveway in front of the proposed freezer. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
D. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard D does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
E. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard E does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
F. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard F has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
G. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard G does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
H. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard H has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
I. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard I does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
J. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard J does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
K. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard K has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
L. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard L has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
M. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard M does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
N. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard N does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
O. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard O has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
P. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard P 9 (Non-Residential Development – Parking) has not been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
Q. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard Q does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
R. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard R has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
S. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard S (Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) has not been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
T. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard T does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
U. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard U does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
V. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard V does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
W. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard W does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
X. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard X has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
Y. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard Y has been met. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
Z. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard Z does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
AA. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard AA does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
BB. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard BB does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
CC. Pam Mitchel made a motion that Performance Standard CC does not apply. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
Pat Hart asked how they should proceed since two of the Performance Standards were not met. Should they continue to review the Site Plan Review Criteria, table the Application or deny it? After a discussion with the Board members and the Applicant, they decided to table it.
Pam Mitchel made a motion to table the Application. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
OTHER BUSINESS
Next months meeting will be held on Tuesday, December 13th.
7.) ADJOURN
Pam Mitchel made a motion to adjourn. Deborah Willis seconded the motion.
Vote: 5 in favor. 0 opposed. Motion passed.
Meeting adjourned at 10:01 PM.
| 
